Legal Opinion

Carey v. Cagney

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 1, 1902No. 14,386PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from judicial district court, parish of Calcasieu; Edmund Denis Miller, Judge. Suit by Carey & Co. and another against Cagney & Foley and by Cagney & Foley against Carey & Co. and another. From judgments in both actions in favor of plaintiffs in the first action, defendants in that action appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

In execution of a judgment recovered by the Cincinnati & Lake Charles Land Company against Franklin W. Jolet, the sheriff of Calcasieu parish, in the year 1896, seized a certain piece or parcel of land belonging to said Jolet, situated in the town of Lake Charles, and in December of the year mentioned adjudicated the same, at sheriff’s sale, to Carey & Co. and L’Hote & Co. The title of the adjudicatees was duly inscribed in the conveyance records of the parish on December 29, 1896.

The following year, 1897, the property was assessed to them for taxes.

It seems they failed to pay these taxes and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marx v. HanthornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Redfield v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Ashley Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  5. Case v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Adsit v. ParkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. In Re Mt. Forest Fur Farms of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. Kivlen v. HorvathSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. Hodgeson v. McDanielSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  5. Charbonnet v. State Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API