Legal Opinion

Tullis v. Nachman & Meertief

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1926No. 3 Div. 514PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

Appellees, plaintiffs in the court below, brought their action in assumpsit against Mrs. Bettis H. Tullis, defendant in the court below (appellant here), and against Clayton Tullis, Sr., the husband of Mrs. Bettis H. Tullis, to recover of them the sum of $227.77, alleged to be due plaintiffs by defendants, on account, together with the interest thereon accrued. Count 1 of the complaint claims said sum to be due on account; count 2 claims for merchandise, goods, and chattels sold; while count 3 claims for money had and received.

There was a discontinuance as to Clayton Tullis, Sr., and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Ponder v. Morris & Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Gafford v. DunhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Bryan v. HunnicuttAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brush v. RountreeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Loveman, Joseph & Loeb, Inc. v. RogersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Hinkle v. LattaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API