Brush v. Rountree
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Judge.
The plaintiff below, appellee, here, stated his claim under three counts of the complaint. The first rested on a written contract to which a copy of the alleged agreement was attached. The second count is in code form on account, and the third also follows the form prescribed by the code for work and labor done.
Demurrers were interposed only to the first count. It is insisted here that the trial court committed reversible error in overruling these demurrers.
The cause was tried below by the court without the aid of a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
It is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Finney v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Halle v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Green v. MarlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Shaw v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Finney v. NewsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Trammell v. RobinsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- White v. JacksonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- W. B. Davis Hosiery Mill, Inc. v. WilsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954