Hinkle v. Latta

CARR, Judge.

This cause is based on a common count for merchandise, goods and chattels sold, and on additional counts in which the terms of a written agreement and a breach thereof are alleged.

The case was tided by the court without the aid of a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

It appears without conflict in the evidence that the parties litigant entered into the following written agreement:

“This contract entered into this the 19th day of Feby, 1945 by and between Joe Latta Party of the first part and J. H. Hinkle party of the second part, Whereas the party of the…