Austin v. Painters' District Council No. 22, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers of America
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
This chancery suit grows out of a dispute between plaintiffs and defendants over a contract entered into between the parties governing their labor relations. Plaintiffs, James Austin, et al., are representatives of themselves and certain painting and decorating contractors in Detroit and Pontiac and surrounding areas. The defendants are Painters’ District Council No. 22, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America, et al. Wayne Association of Painting and Decorating Contractors, Inc., et al., are intervening defendants.
The plaintiffs have had contractual relations with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Opera on Tour, Inc. v. WeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Goldfinger v. FeintuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Bossert v. . DhuyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- May's Furs & Ready-To-Wear, Inc. v. BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cantieny v. FriebeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Alpha Beta Food Markets, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers WorkmenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Sovereign v. SovereignMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Haenlein v. Saginaw Building Trades CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Mitcham v. Ark-La. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.