Legal Opinion

Cantieny v. Friebe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1954No. Docket 37, Calendar 46,285PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Defendants Ernest C. Friebe and his wife, Maude Friebe, have appealed from an order of - the circuit court for the county of Alcona, which was entered on August 27, 1953. As a result of this order a temporary injunction obtained by plaintiffs Nicholas H. Cantieny and his wife, May E. Cantieny, individually and as agents of Adolph Gr. Bahlau and Ms wife, Ann BaMau, on June 20, 1953, was made permanent.

This temporary injunction restrained defendants, their agents and assigns, from erecting, closing or loclring any gates upon a road which extends northerly from State highway M-72 to the Cantieny…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hasselbring v. KoepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Murphy Chair Co. v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Harvey v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Moore v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Unverzagt v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blackhawk Development Corp. v. Village of DexterMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. County of Todd, Minn. v. LoegeringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. Williams v. Northern Natural Gas CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
  4. County of Todd v. LoegeringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. Frey v. ScottMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API