Mitcham v. Ark-La. Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
■Bernard Whetstone, Special Associate Justice.
This-proceeding originated in this court as a Petition for writ of Prohibition. During oral argument it was stipulated that the entire matter be treated as an appeal and' considered and decided here on its merits (in view of the-time element involved in the facts of the case and also-in view of the question involved being one of public interest).
In this converted form, involved is the question of the jurisdiction of the Chancery Court below to entertain a petition on behalf of building construction contractor (s) to enjoin (peaceful) picketing by…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Liner v. Jafco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Radio & Television Broadcast Technicians Local Union 1264 v. Broadcast Service of Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Langrehr v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 772 (A.F.L.-C.I.O.)Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Intl. Hodcarriers Local 1282 v. Cone-HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Mitcham v. Ark-La. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Wysonga McGlothlin v. James R. Cullington, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999