Legal Opinion

Richardello v. Butka

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 10, 1997No. File CV960056397SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

Before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss this prejudgment remedy application for lack of jurisdiction. Because the court finds proper service was made by the sheriff and that the action should not fail for reason of return of the process to the wrong venue, the motion is denied. The court holds that when a sheriff, in good faith, starts his service in a place located in the county where he holds office, that constitutes commencement of service sufficient to satisfy statutory provisions permitting him to complete service in other counties.

OnNovember 14,1996, the plaintiff, Mary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Savage v. AronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Pantlin & Chananie Development Corp. v. Hartford Cement & Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Third Taxing District v. LyonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. MacO v. Statewide Grievance Comm., No. Cv940066778 (Jan. 23, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Betensky v. Opcon Associates, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
  2. Buffing v. K-Mart Corporation, No. Cv00-69096s (May 23, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
  3. Doctor's Associates v. Despain, No. Cv00 07 17 78s (Apr. 25, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
  4. Lucas v. Milford Police Union, No. Cv99 0068796s (Feb. 13, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
  5. State v. Zuckerman, No. Cv01 07 41 84s (Jun. 20, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API