Legal Opinion
Lee v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
Under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, plaintiff has moved for summary judgment in her favor and defendant has similarly cross-moved seeking a dismissal of the complaint.
In the action, plaintiff, widow and beneficiary under a life insurance policy issued by the defendant insurance company to her deceased husband, sues to recover $10,000 and interest under certain double indemnity provisions of the policy.
The facts have been stipulated in an agreed statement dated August 23, 1943, which is annexed to plaintiff’s moving papers.
The facts are as follows: The Guardian Life Insurance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Head v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- People v. . BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pafford v. Standard Life Ins. Co. of IndianaSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Faron v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Funk v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Rockgate Management Co. v. CGU Ins., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
- Smith v. BoerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965