Legal Opinion

Funk v. New York Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

Both sides move for summary judgment. Concededly there is no disputed issue of fact. The only question presented is the interpretation of a provision in certain policies of life insurance. Plaintiff as administratrix sues to recover $20,000 double indemnity due under three policies of life insurance issued by the defendant in 1929. The insured died in an airplane accident while. a passenger on a plane bound from Miami, Florida, to New York City. Single indemnity in the amount of $20,000 has been paid. Under' the policies the defendant had agreed to pay double indemnity upon proof of death of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Lee v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lee v. Guardian Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pafford v. Standard Life Ins. Co. of IndianaSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Faron v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Western Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API