Passatempo v. McMenimen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is Frederick McMenimen’s second improper attempt to secure interlocutory relief from a certain ruling in the trial court. In McMenimen v. Passatempo, 452 Mass. 178 (2008) (McMenimen I), we affirmed the denial of a G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition that he had filed in the county court. In the petition, he sought interlocutory review of the denial in the trial court of a motion to dismiss that he had filed in the underlying civil action against him. The basis for that motion was his argument that G. L. c. 175, § 181, which the plaintiffs in the underlying action asserted McMenimen had violated,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- McMenimen v. PassatempoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Littles v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- McGrath v. McGrathMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
3Cited by6 opinions
- Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. VacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Gianareles v. ZegarowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Brown v. MendesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
- Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.