Legal Opinion

Passatempo v. McMenimen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 14, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is Frederick McMenimen’s second improper attempt to secure interlocutory relief from a certain ruling in the trial court. In McMenimen v. Passatempo, 452 Mass. 178 (2008) (McMenimen I), we affirmed the denial of a G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition that he had filed in the county court. In the petition, he sought interlocutory review of the denial in the trial court of a motion to dismiss that he had filed in the underlying civil action against him. The basis for that motion was his argument that G. L. c. 175, § 181, which the plaintiffs in the underlying action asserted McMenimen had violated,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. McMenimen v. PassatempoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Littles v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. McGrath v. McGrathMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. VacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Gianareles v. ZegarowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Brown v. MendesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
  5. Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API