Legal Opinion

McGrath v. McGrath

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 3, 2006No. 05-P-512PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.

Does a single justice of this court have jurisdiction to entertain a petition brought under G. L. c. 231, § 118, first par., from a Superior Court order denying reconsideration of an earlier interlocutory order, from which no *671such petition was filed? General Laws c. 231, § 118, first par., provides in pertinent part: “A party aggrieved by an interlocutory order of a trial court justice . . . may file, within thirty days of the entry of such order, a petition in the appropriate appellate court seeking relief from such order.” General Laws c. 231, § 118, second par., concerns interlocutory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Long v. WickettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Alfred D. Fisichelli v. The City Known as the Town of MethuenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. Selby Associates v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  4. Muir v. HallMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Raheman v. RahemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. DeLucia v. KfouryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  3. Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Alberti v. AlbertiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API