Loftus v. Romsa Construction, Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
In this case, John R. Loftus, Jr. and his wife, Gwendolyn B. Loftus (collectively Loftus), question whether an affirmative defense, specifically the statute of repose found in Wyo.Stat. § 1-3-111 (1988), must be deemed waived by the failure to plead it or by admitting an inconsistent factual allegation. Romsa Construction, Inc. (Romsa), not only failed to plead the statute of repose in its answer, but it admitted a factual allegation that the home, which allegedly was the product of defective construction, was completed within the ten-year period specified in the statute. In a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Harris v. GrizzleWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Phillips v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Usrey Ex Rel. Usrey v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chesapeake Exploration, Llc, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company v. Morton Production Company, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
- Rupp v. HurleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- BHP Petroleum (Americas), Inc. v. Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Rupp v. HurleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999