Legal Opinion

Rupp v. Hurley

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1999No. 18,272Published

1Opinion of the Court

979 P.2d 733 (1999)

127 N.M. 222

1999-NMCA-057

Kelly RUPP, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Lloyd HURLEY, M.D., and Sidney Schultz, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18,272.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

March 5, 1999.

Steven L. Tucker, Tucker Law Firm, P.C., Santa Fe, for Appellant.

Alice Tomlinson Lorenz, Ranne B. Miller, Miller, Stratvert & Torgerson, P.A., Albuquerque, Michael J. Dekleva, Madison, Harbour, Mroz & Brennan, P.A., Albuquerque, for Appellees.

OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

{1} This case aptly illustrates the observation that procedural miscues can produce quite substantive consequences. The district…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Giotis v. Apollo of the Ozarks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. 51 Pieces Of Real Property, Roswell, New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. David Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. AtlasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. FranksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API