Legal Opinion

Canton v. Graniteville Fire District No. 4

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 22, 2000No. 99-429PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Granite-ville Fire District No. 4 appeals from a jury verdict holding it liable for changing the natural flow of surface water onto plaintiff Karen Canton’s property and causing damage in the amount of $27,000. On appeal, defendant claims there was insufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that defendant had changed the natural flow of water. Defendant also appeals the award of prejudgment interest, arguing that the jury as finder of fact in this case, not the judge, was the correct body for determining whether an award of interest was due. We affirm.

Taken in the light most…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Soucy v. Soucy Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  3. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. McGee Construction Co. v. Neshobe Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. Retrovest Associates, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. John Larkin, Inc. v. MarceauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. Appeal of CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. Frances Nesti v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  4. Keith & Jackie Lorman, Charles & Melissa Gallagher, and Daniel & Alicia Daly v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  5. Foster v. Bittersweet Experience, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API