Keith & Jackie Lorman, Charles & Melissa Gallagher, and Daniel & Alicia Daly v. City of Rutland
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. Plaintiffs sought relief from the City of Rutland after suffering sewage backups in their homes. The trial court granted summary judgment to the City, concluding that plaintiffs failed to adequately support their negligence, nuisance, trespass, and constitutional takings claims. Plaintiffs appeal, arguing that they produced sufficient evidence to survive summary judgment. We affirm the court's decision.
¶ 2. The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted. Plaintiffs live on Butterfly Avenue in the City of Rutland. The City's sewage/stormwater system is over 100 years old. Two…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Dallas v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Price A. Baum Margaret Leedy v. United States v. Michael A. Massey, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Johnston v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elizabeth Swett, Doug Earle, Gordon Stake v. Brian GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- Frances Nesti v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- Connelly v. City of St. Albans, VermontDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024
- Ivo Skoric v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- Martell v. City of St. Albans, VermontDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.