Legal Opinion

Zanghi v. Rifice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Friedmann, J.

At issue in the instant case is whether a boat basin which leads to a navigable waterway is located entirely within the plaintiffs’ property, and therefore, whether the plaintiffs may preclude the defendants, who own an adjoining parcel of property, from using that boat basin. After concluding that the boat basin was artificially created and located entirely within the plaintiffs’ property, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their first cause of action. We affirm the order insofar as appealed from.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Fairchild v. KraemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. De Camp v. ThomsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Town of North Hempstead v. BonnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. De Camp v. . DixNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mascolo v. Romaz Properties, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Friedman v. Bloomberg L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. Talmidov Inc. v. Marina Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API