Legal Opinion
Mascolo v. Romaz Properties, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J), dated May 10, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment and granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting the cross motion and substituting therefor a provision denying the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the complaint is reinstated.
The plaintiffs and the defendant own…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Brookhaven v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Hinkley v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Rumsey v. New York & New England R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- City of New York v. Wilson & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of New York v. Gowanus Industrial Park, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Clancy v. BortolisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026