Legal Opinion
Miami Conservancy District v. Bucher
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1949No. 2039PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By WISEMAN, J:
This is an appeal on questions of law and fact from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, Ohio, wherein judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff in an action brought by the Miami Conservancy District against the two owners of four parcels of real estate situated in the City of Dayton to enforce the collection of conservancy assessments levied against said property.
In 1917 a basic levy of 36% of the appraised benefits and in 1920 a basic levy of 14% of the appraised benefits was made by the Board under the provisions of §6828-45 GC. No…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Logan v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. McLean v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Endlich v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Adamski v. B.U.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1959
- City of Dayton v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Morse Signal Devices, Inc. v. DonahueUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.