Legal Opinion

Amber Motko v. Geisinger Health Plan

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00732Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMBER MOTKO, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:24-CV-00732 v. (SAPORITO, J.) GEISINGER HEALTH PLAN, Defendant. MEMORANUM On April 29, 2024, the plaintiff, Amber Motko, initiated this action against Geisinger Health Plan (“Geisinger”) by filing a complaint raising claims of discrimination, retaliation, and failure to accommodate under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 42 P.S. § 951 . (Doc. 1). On August 23, 2024, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint asserting those same…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API