Legal Opinion
United States v. Belgarde
District Court, D. Montana
Decided May 22, 2001No. CR-00-74-GF-DWMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOLLOY, Chief Judge.
On April 16, 2001, the court entered an order dismissing the Indictment filed in this matter. Presently before the court is the government’s motion urging the court to reconsider its ruling. For the reasons discussed below, the motion to reconsider is denied.
BACKGROUND
The Indictment charged defendant Belgarde with committing burglary in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153 and MCA 45-6-204, by unlawfully entering the Department of Family Services Building in Wolf Point, Montana, with the intent to commit theft. Section 1153 of Title 18, commonly referred to as the Indian…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leaburn ALEXANDER, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Martin James MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Donald A. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Errol D., Jr., a JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Curtis A. Belgarde, United States of America v. Curtis A. BelgardeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Curtis A. Belgarde, United States of America v. Curtis A. BelgardeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Errol D., Jr., a JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002