Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin James Maloney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1979No. 77-3835PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Maloney, a Navajo Indian, was found guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 661 for taking $1,797 from Mrs. McCray, also a Navajo Indian, while on an Indian reservation. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the district court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that they had *224to find that the appellant intended to permanently deprive Mrs. McCray of the money before they could find him guilty as charged in the indictment. Three concomitant questions arise from the consideration of that issue in the present appeal: (1) whether the offense of larceny is…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Elanith Valansi v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Cheryl SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Mattie Doll Simmons, United States of America v. Maurice BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Barbara'kae HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API