United States v. Errol D., Jr., a Juvenile
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.
Errol D., a juvenile and a member of the Fort Peck Tribe, appeals his delinquency adjudication and sentence for burglarizing the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) facili*1161ties management building on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation. We hold that the criminal statute under which he was charged-the Indian Major Crimes Act (“MCA”) (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1153)-does not give jurisdiction to the federal government to prosecute him, nor does it accord the district court jurisdiction to adjudge him delinquent. Accordingly, we vacate Errol D.’s delinquency adjudication…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. BlyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Lucio Pina-Jaime, AKA Lucio Pina Jaime AKA Lucio Jaime PinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Curtis A. Belgarde, United States of America v. Curtis A. BelgardeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Other MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.