Legal Opinion
Fluorine On Call Ltd v. Fluorogas Limited
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 10, 2004No. 03-50419PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRADO, Circuit Judge:
This case arises from a “Memorandum of Understanding” between Fluorogas Limited (“Fluorogas”) and Fluorine on Call, Ltd. (“FOC”). Flourogas is a small English company that develops and manufactures fluorine generators. It was owned by Graham Hodgson, who was also its president. FOC is a Texas company that began with two brothers, Frederick and Stephen Siegele. The Siegeles sought to enter what they viewed as the potential market for on-site fluorine generators for use in the semiconductor industry.
This potential market arises from the need to clean manufacturing…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Acrylicon USA, LLC v. Silikal GMBHCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Theriot v. Transamerica Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
- Acrylicon USA, LLC v. Silikal GMBHCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Amco Energy, Incorporated v. Tana ExploratiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Amco Energy, Incorporated v. Tana ExploratiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.