Legal Opinion

Bernal v. Garrison

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided November 14, 1991No. 13-90-393-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is an action for breach of contract. Appellee, John Garrison, sued appellant, Edgar Bernal, individually and d/b/a APOA, and Antimony Products of America d/b/a APOA, alleging breach of a written employment contract. The jury found that APOA breached the contract and awarded Garrison damages, attorney’s fees for preparation and trial, and appeal. The trial court entered judgment against Antimony Products of America (APOA), adding on $5,085.09 in prejudgment interest. Only APOA is a party to this appeal. APOA brings ten points of error. We reform the judgment,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Garcia-Marroquin v. Nueces County Bail Bond Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  2. Murphy v. Seabarge, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Sassen v. Tanglegrove Townhouse Condominium Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  4. Smith v. Renz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  5. Lopez v. Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API