Legal Opinion

Dietemann v. People Ex Rel. Blackman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 5, 1925No. 10,790PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Anton Schindelholtz died testate April 15, 1902. Letters testamentary were issued to his executrix June 9, 1902. The estate was closed by decree of final settlement April 15, 1907. On July 31, 1915, the estate was reopened and the executrix reinstated only for the purpose of prosecuting an indian depredation claim in the United States Court of Claims. While thus pending and on October 23, 1917, the state inheritance tax commissioner filed in the estate matter a caveat, pursuant to section 23 of the Revenue Act of 1913 (Laws 1913, p. 554). No further action was taken thereon nor was any other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nunnemacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Chambers v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Robinson v. BierceTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Union Trust Co. v. Wayne Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hanberg v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jefferson County Department of Social Services v. D.A.G.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. City of Pendleton v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Shootman v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. v. YoungWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dietemann v. People Ex Rel. BlackmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API