Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. Young

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1932No. 1714PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

This case relates to the inheritance taxes payable by the estate of Prank G. Curtis. The decedent died testate on March 16, 1922, leaving his widow and a number of other persons as beneficiaries under his will. In December, 1923, a so-called compromise agreement was entered into between the executors of the estate on the one hand and the inheri- tanee tax commissioner with the approval of the attorney general of this state on the other, purporting to be made in accordance with See. 34, Ch. 126, Session Laws of 1921, which provides that whenever an estate from which an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Matter of HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. People ex rel. Stead v. Spring Lake Drainage & Levee DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  4. In re CooganNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Berge v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Peters Grazing Association v. LegerskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API