Legal Opinion

Shootman v. Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 4, 1996No. 95SC84PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

The issue in this case is whether the State of Colorado (State) is exempt from statutes of limitation under the doctrine of nullum tempus occurrit regí (time does not run against the king). The State brought an action against the driver and the owner of a truck to recover for damage the truck caused to a highway tunnel wall. The trial court granted the State’s motion for summary judgment based on the defendants’ admission of negligence, notwithstanding that the statute of limitation for tort actions had run before the State brought suit. The trial court held that the State’s action was not…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Bertrand v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. Myers v. Genesee County AuditorMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Kermit Lumber & Pressure Treating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Fennelly v. A-1 MacHine & Tool Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Condon v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. In the Matter of the FORT TOTTEN METRORAIL CASES ARISING OUT OF the EVENTS OF JUNE 22, 2009District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. King v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API