Call v. Sumitomo Bank of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
881 F.2d 626
11 Employee Benefits Ca 1273
Sterling CALL, Ralph Robinson and Edison Willers, as
individuals; Sterling Call and Ralph Robinson as Plan
Administrators of the Phase II Corporation Restated Profit
Sharing Plan; and Sterling Call, Kenneth Friedman and
Edison Willers as Plan Administrators of the California
Etching Corporation Restated Profit Sharing Plan,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SUMITOMO BANK OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, Ray
W. Sherman, Jr., an individual, Khateeb A. Lateef,
an individual, and Lateef Management
Associates, a partnership,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-15076.
United…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. California Law Enforcement Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Chemung Canal Trust Co. ex rel. Fairway Spring Co. v. Sovran Bank/MarylandDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1990
- Miller v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990