Legal Opinion

Lorna A. Matthiesen, an Individual v. Banc One Mortgage Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1999No. 98-6069PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Lorna Matthiesen appeals from the grant of summary judgment by the district court to defendant Bank One Mortgage Corporation (BOMC) on her claims of gender discrimination in a loan application, in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691(a) (ECOA), and failure to disclose the sources relied upon to deny her loan application, in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681(m) (FCRA). In reviewing the grant of summary judgment, we examine the record de novo, applying the same standard as that used by the district…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Evers v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Medina v. CramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Chiang v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Charlotte Mays v. Buckeye Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. And Frederick B. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Squires ex rel. Squires v. GoodwinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API