Legal Opinion
In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 20, 2000No. Misc. 99-197(TFH), MDL 1285PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: Jurisdictional Discovery Issues
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are eight foreign defendants’ Rule 53 Objections to the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation Respecting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and Defendants’ Motions for Protective Orders (“Report” or “Report and Recommendation”). Upon careful consideration of the Special Master’s Report regarding jurisdictional discovery, the defendants’ Objections, the plaintiffs’ response, the defendants’ replies, and the entire record herein, the Court will adopt the Special Master’s Report in part…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. 51 Pieces Of Real Property, Roswell, New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- In re Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Société Commerciale ToutélectricCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Filler v. LernoutDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.