Legal Opinion
Filler v. Lernout
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 13, 2003No. Nos. CIV.A. 00-11589-PBS, CIV.A. 02-10302-PBS, CIV.A. 02-10303-PBS, CIV.A. 02-10304-PBSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM DEFENDANT KLYNVELD PEAT MARWICK GOERDELER BEDRIJFSREVISOREN (# 471 in 00cv11589, # 232 in 02cv10302, #205 in 02cvl0303 & #237 in 02cv10304)
COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.
J. Introduction
The plaintiffs have moved to compel a large scale production of documents by defendant Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerderler Bedrijrsrevisoren (“KPMG-B”), a Belgian entity. In support of their motion, the plaintiffs submitted a memorandum of law (# 474), a Declaration of Professor Matthias Edward Storme (#473) and an Affidavit of Patrick…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quaak v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler BedrijfsrevisorenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Strauss v. Credit Lyonnais, S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Weiss v. National Westminster Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Warlop v. LernoutDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007