Legal Opinion
McCloud v. Rosanne Kane of New York State Division of Parole
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 4, 2007No. 06 CV 3862(ADS)(AKT)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
Michael McCloud (the “plaintiff’), acting pro se, commenced this action against his parole officer, Rosanne Kane (the “defendant”), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently before the Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”).
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are derived from the complaint and from the exhibits annexed to the complaint, and are taken as true for the purpose of this motion. On November 16, 2001, the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Singleton v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Cusamano v. AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Trisvan v. AnnucciDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Germaine Vester Brown v. Niagara Falls Police Department; Shanley; Proietti; Miles; Peter Wydysh; Tarnowski; and WildtDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2026
- Jo-Ann Connelly v. William Tong, et alDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.