Marrow v. Brinkley
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from decree of circuit court of Elizabeth City county, rendered October 26th, 1886, in a certain suit in equity wherein William P. Marrow and Mary E., his wife, and two others were plaintiffs, and Joseph B. Brinkley and others were defendants. The court, hy the said decree, having dismissed the bill of the plaintiffs, they obtained an appeal to this court. Opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtFauntleroy, J.
The petition of William P. Marrow and Mary E., his wife, George B. West and Missouri Smith, represents that they are aggrieved by a decree of the circuit court of Elizabeth City county, rendered on the 26th day of October, 1886, in a chancery cause in said court pending, in which they, the said petitioners, are complainants, and Joseph B. Brinkley, John L. Peek, John B. Whitehead, A. P. Thom, trustee, William H. Kimberley, Martin McDevitt, Charles F. Groome and Emma. D., his wife, George W. Schermerhorn and George Booker are defendants.
At the August rules, 1870, J. B. Brinkley, a judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hayward v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Griffin v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Blackwell v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Teter v. IrwinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Marshall v. McDermittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.