Legal Opinion

Van Eman v. Mosing

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1912No. 2285PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Brror from District Court, Pawnee County; - L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by William Mosing against G. S. Van Eman. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

In January, 1907, Van Eman and Mosing each owned an undivided one-half interest in the S. E. of section 20, township 20 N., range 7 E., in Pawnee county. ^Several years prior, a grantor in the chain of title had incumbered the quarter section with a mortgage for $800. January 5, 1907, the two owners by mutual agreement partitioned the land; Van Eman quitclaiming to Mosing the W. and Mosing to Van Eman the E. of the quarter section. Van Eman received the improved 80 and paid Mosing $200 as boot to equal ize the values. It was understood that the incumbrance should hold in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scholten v. BarberIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Nelson v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Mueller v. RenkesMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Crebbin v. ShinnColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Searing v. BentonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Interstate Land & I. Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Beardsley v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Hulin v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API