Legal Opinion
Ruhter v. Steele
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided August 15, 1949No. 16,245PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
The parties appear here in the same order as they appeared in the trial court and will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, or by name.
The defendants, V. H. Steele and K. K. Orvis, filed their motion to dismiss the writ of error as to them. Defendants Josephine McCausland, Ross D. McCausland, W. R. McCausland, and U. S. Coal Corporation have also filed in this court their separate motion to dismiss the writ of error. It is contended on behalf of all moving defendants that the writ of error should be dismissed with prejudice.
The plaintiffs have filed their motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Boxwell v. Greeley Union National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Town of Mountain View v. KirkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoff v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Cyr v. District Court In & For the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Cyr v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR CITY & CTY. OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984