Frias v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILL, Justice.
Rudy Frias appeals from his conviction by a jury of the offense of aggravated sexual assault. The jury assessed his punishment at twenty-five years in the Texas Department of Corrections. In five points of error, Frias urges that the trial court erred in refusing, at the punishment stage of the trial, his requested charge on voluntary intoxication, and that the court erred in overruling his objections that arguments of the prosecutor: (1) commented on his failure to testify; (2) were unsworn testimony of the prosecutor; (3) were personal opinion of the prosecutor; and (4)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Sikes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Puckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reyna v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Maupin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Andrew Lanz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
- John Carl Arabie, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.