Sikes v. State

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of robbery by assault. The jury assessed punishment at fifty years.

Appellant’s brief, containing twenty-one grounds of error, was not timely filed in *651accordance with the provisions of Article 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. However, in the interest of justice, we have examined his allegations and find only two that should be discussed. He contends that the court commented on the weight of the evidence and the court erred in overruling an objection to the argument of the prosecutor.

We affirm.

The sufficiency of the evidence is…