Legal Opinion

Maupin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1996No. 2-94-403-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHUCK MILLER, Justice (Assigned).

Appellant Dickey Ray Maupin was indicted for the offense of injury to the elderly. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.04, subsection (a)(3), (c)(2), and (f) (Vernon 1994). 1 Maupin pleaded not guilty to a jury, and after hearing evidence, the jury found Maupin guilty, and also, after the punishment phase of the trial, assessed his punishment at eight years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. On appeal Maupin brings three points of error, alleging error both in the court’s charge and in final argument. We affirm.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Harold Robert Plants v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Amber Renee Guyger v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021
  5. Frank Edward Byrd, III v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API