Legal Opinion
Bintz v. Mid-City Park Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 16, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.
The action is to recover damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff is a registered engineer, designer and builder of swimming pools. The defendant is a corporation conducting a pleasure resort. K. B. Hazzard was its president. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract, executed for defendant by Hazzard, by which contract the plaintiff was employed to prepare plans and specifications for a swimming pool, with dance hall, balcony and other necessary adjuncts, not later than April 1, 1924; to receive and open bids at such time and place as should be designated by the president; to give…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patterson v. . MeyerhoferNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Patterson v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Carns v. BassickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Zadek v. Olds, Wortman & KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Harrison v. . Argyle CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bintz v. City of HornellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Wineman v. Blueprint 100, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Brockhurst v. RyanNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Wormuth v. Lower Eastside Action Project, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972
- Wormuth v. Lower Eastside Action Project, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972