Wormuth v. Lower Eastside Action Project, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Given the custom described in the opposing papers and the fact that defendant knew that plaintiff, a State of Louisiana architect, did not have a New York license yet availed itself of his services as architect, defendant is not entitled to summary judgment.
Defendant waited until plaintiff’s services were completed and then raised the question of the license to avoid payment. In these circumstances, the parties are in pari delicto. .While plaintiff should not have practiced architecture in this State without a New York license, defendant should not have knowingly called upon him to do…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Store Equipment & Construction Corp. v. Jack Dempsey's Punch Bowl, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- American Store Equipment & Construction Corp. v. Jack Dempsey's Punch Bowl, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Bintz v. Mid-City Park Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Roth v. Hoster Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wineman v. Blueprint 100, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Joseph v. David M. Schwarz/Architectural Services, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Gargano v. SmithCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Millington v. RapoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Old Dominion Lodge No. 1 v. Smoky Mountain Secrets, Inc.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.