Legal Opinion

Bintz v. City of Hornell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1945PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

On August 29, 1938, the plaintiff and “ Ernest Gr. Stewart, Pres. D. P. Works, City of Hornell, N. Y.” entered into an agreement whereby the plaintiff undertook to deliver plans and specifications for the installation of a Bintz Patented Swimming Pool, Patent No. 1,572,465, within fourteen days. The plaintiff also agreed to fill out forms for the procuring of a Federal grant to be used “ in the building and equipping of this project.” The agreement provided that the “ owner ”, hereinafter referred to as the City, was to receive and open bids for the construction and equipping of the pool not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Poel v. . Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Moran v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Benton v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Smith v. . DotterweichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Estate of Frances Hatch v. NYCO Minerals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Castellano v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Posner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lowe v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Industrial Development Foundation of Auburn, New York, Inc. v. United States Hoffman Machinery Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API