Legal Opinion

City of Topeka v. National Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1932No. 30,596PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to collect the amount of a bonu given to guarantee compliance with the terms of a franchise ordinance. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The city of Topeka passed an ordinance giving a franchise to the Industrial Gas Company to furnish gas to industrial users in the city. The part of the ordinance which it is necessary for us to consider is section 5. It is as follows:

“Sec. 5. That within thirty (30) days after acceptance of this ordinance by the grantee and as one of the considerations for granting the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. School District No. 1 v. McCurleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Hull v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Whiting v. Village of New BaltimoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Winfrey v. Galena Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
  2. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. White Lakes Shopping Center, Inc. v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Sunflower Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Tomlinson Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  5. Freeto v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API