Legal Opinion

Supreme Conclave v. Miles

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1901PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Harlan, C. J.) The defendant’s third prayer asked the Court to instruct the jury that if they find from the evidence that benefit certificate No. 57103 was issued by the defendant company Miles Tull, in which N. J. P. Tull was named as beneficiary on the 5th day of August, 1898, and that if they further find that prior to the issuance of said benefit certificate to the said Miles Tull, to wit, on the 2nd day of August, 1898,…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Harlan, C. J.) The defendant’s third prayer asked the Court to instruct the jury that if they find from the evidence that benefit certificate No. 57103 was issued by the defendant company Miles Tull, in which N. J. P. Tull was named as beneficiary on the 5th day of August, 1898, and that if they further find that prior to the issuance of said benefit certificate to the said Miles Tull, to wit, on the 2nd day of August, 1898, he, the said Miles Tull, expressed the intention of not returning to his then home alive if he got no position ; and…

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This suit was instituted in the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City against the appellant, a Mutual Benefit Association, duly incorporated under the laws of Maryland, by one Nathan J. P. Tull to recover the amount of a benefit certificate issued by the said corporation to one Miles Tull, a son of the plaintiff, and made payable to the plaintiff. Pending the suit the said plaintiff died, and the appellees here, upon suggestion of his death, became parties plaintiff as administrators of his estate. The narr. in the case consisted of two counts, in each of which, after setting forth matter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Supreme Commandery of the Knights of the Golden Rule v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Darrow v. . Family Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Fitch v. . American Popular Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Morris v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilmington Trust Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. DurdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Grand Legion v. BeatyIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Jackson v. Loyal Additional Ben. Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Smith v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API