Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Veatch v. Franklin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

None of the defendants has appeared in this court, and we are therefore without the benefit of argument supporting the decree.

The lien provision of § 40-518, Oregon Code 1930, was held valid by this court in State v. Swensk, 161 Or. 281, 89 P. (2d) 587. Swensk, the owner of property used for cannery purposes, contended in that case that to enforce the lien for delinquent poundage fees would deprive him of. his property without due process of law, because, owing to provisions in tbe statute wbicb forbid making public tbe information required to be given to tbe commission by persons liable for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Provident Institution for Savings v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Savage v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Christian v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. State v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Terry v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Union Land Associates v. UssherOregon Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API