Legal Opinion

United States v. Republic Oil Refining Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 17, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, District Judge.

On October 6, 1934, a bill of complaint was filed in the case wherein the Republic Oil Refining Company was named as defendant.

In brief the bill recites that pursuant to the provisions of title 1, § 9 (c) of an Act of Congress, approved June 16, 1933, known as the National Industrial Recovery Act (15 USCA § 709(e) the President of the United States is authorized to prohibit the transportation in interstate commerce of petroleum and the products thereof, produced or withdrawn from storage in excess of the amount permitted to be produced or withdrawn from storage by any…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Buffington v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. Behre v. Anchor Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  5. Curtis Pub. Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evening News Publishing Co. v. Allied Newspaper CarriersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
  2. United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1944
  3. Green v. GravattDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. In re DunklyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1946
  5. Menominee & Marinette Light & Traction Co. v. City of MenomineeDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API