United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.. The United States of America brought this action for the purpose of 'having can-celled by judgment of this court. Patent No. 1,744,016 and Patent No. 1,779,195 dealing with the process ’ of cold rolling metals. The principal ground of the complaint is that fraud was perpetrated upon the Patent Office by defendants in securing the issuance of these patents. Other allegations in the complaint are that all or parts of the patents should be cancelled upon various grounds other than fraud in the procurement thereof, such as mutual mistake of fact, and that as a matter of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Glaxo Group LimitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1945
- United States v. Hartford-Empire Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Flournoy v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.