Riley v. City of Corning
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
Appellant Tim Riley was convicted upon a plea of nolo contendere in Corning Municipal Court of driving while intoxicated. Thereafter, he and his attorney, appellant Gary Day Garland; sought a declaratory judgment declaring Act 332 of 1969, by which the Corning Municipal Court was created, unconstitutional because it constituted “local legislation” in violation of Ark. Const, art. 14. Garland’s claim to standing as a plaintiff in the action was that he had been refused a position on the ballot in a municipal judgeship election because the county election commission found…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moose v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- County of Searcy v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Lawson v. City of Mammoth SpringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Liggett v. Church of NazareneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Mid-State Construction Co. v. MeansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allred v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Columbia Mutual Insurance v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Murdock v. SlaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Hooker v. Deere Credit Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998