Murdock v. Slater
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREE LAYTON Roaf, Justice.
This case presents an issue of first impression in Arkansas — whether a defendant who defaults in municipal court has a right to a direct de novo appeal to circuit court. Charles E. Slater, Jr., obtained a default judgment against Claude Murdock in the small-claims division of municipal court. Murdock timely filed for a de novo appeal to circuit court, where he also filed a belated answer and counterclaim. The circuit court dismissed Murdock’s appeal, finding that the failure to timely respond or appear in municipal court constituted a consent or confession of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Selig v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Allred v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Bussey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Watson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes, & Lerach, LLP v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes, & Lerach, LLP v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Sundeen v. KrogerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Sundeen v. KrogerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003