Legal Opinion
United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 18, 2007No. 04-11282PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES and CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judges:
We took this case en banc to reevaluate the panel’s treatment of United States v. Thier, 801 F.2d 1463 (5th Cir.1986). Relying on Thier, which held that the notice and hearing requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 applied to restraining orders issued under the criminal forfeiture statute, a panel of this Court vacated the district court’s restraining order for noncompliance with Rule 65. United States v. Holy Land Found, for Relief and Dev., 445 F.3d 771 (5th Cir.2006), vacated for reh’g en banc (2006). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. KaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Samnorwood Independent School District v. Texas Education AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- David Peterson v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Pate v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Sunrise Academy v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.